 United States Shale Plays
- Antrim Shale in the Michigan Basin
- Chattanooga Shale in the Black Warrior Basin
- Cody Shale in the Montana Thrust Belt
- Conasauga Shale in the Valley and Ridge Province
- Excello-Mulky Shale in the Cherokee Platform
- Fayetteville Shale in the Arkoma Basin
- Floyd-Neal Shale in the Black Warrior Basin
- Gammon Shale in the Williston Basin
- Haynesville-Bossier Shale in the Texas-Louisiana-Mississippi Salt Basin
- Hermosa Shale in the Piceance Basin
- Hillard-Baxter-Mancos Shale in the Greater Green River Basin
- Lewis Shale in the San Juan Basin
- Mancos Shale in the Uinta Basin
- Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian Basin
- New Albany Shale in the Illinois Basin
- Pierre Shale in the Raton Basin
- Woodford Shale in the Anadarko Basin
For shale boundaries, please visit the Energy Information Administration’s exploration, resources, reserves, and production maps.
The Committee is a source for information on technology that has been used or tested in the Barnett Shale in regards to fresh and produced water management. Members of the Committee have access to a repository for different technologies that are being evaluated and employed by the industry.
Regulations vary widely from state to state; therefore, the committee does not comment on issues involved in plays other than the Barnett Shale. However, our website is a place for factual information about why something works in one play, but cannot be used in another. Our goal is to become a valuable resource to those that are concerned with the government relations or public relations aspects of water in the states they are doing business.
Learn more about How to Join. |
